Objectives
This colloquium has as main objective to generate a
space to share thoughts and experiences, on the
assessment of learning outcomes in higher education:
trends, debates and future perspectives internationally
and in Mexico. Besides, the main lessons learned from
the participation of Mexico in the Feasibility Study
"Assessing Learning Outcomes" coordinated by the OECD,
will be presented.
About assessment of learning outcomes
While the assessment of learning has long
been a fundamental aspect of the educational process, in
recent decades there has been concern in relation to
have evidence about obtaining certain learning expected
at the end of a formative stage. For example, to check
if the attributes of the graduate profiles or skills
acquired meet the desired expectations.
Today, the assessment of learning outcomes in many
countries is one of the key components of the evaluation
systems of quality of graduates, programs and
educational institutions through a wide variety of
methods and strategies such as those offered by the
CENEVAL in Mexico.
However, it remains a key challenge due to the changes
and tensions that higher education deals with, in this
century. The evaluation of learning outcomes acquired a
new dimension at the light of challenges such as
internationalization; the construction of educational,
social and global scientific projects; the demands of
the global labor markets; the generation of cross
learning about sustainability, human rights, gender,
inclusion, multiculturalism and other issues raised by
various agencies and organizations; and the development
of generic skills such as those proposed by the Tuning
project for knowledge societies.
For this reason, one purpose of the Colloquium is
precisely to open a space to share ideas and experiences
on the assessment of learning outcomes in higher
education: its trends, debates and future perspectives
internationally and in Mexico.
About the AHELO feasibility study
The theme of assessing learning outcomes in higher
education, caught the attention of the Ministers of
Education from countries members of the OECD meeting, in
Athens in 2006. The reflection was oriented toward how
to better understand and assess the various dimensions
of the quality of higher education, recognizing that
there is little information on the results of students
learning.
During 2007, the OECD organized three meetings of
experts in order to analyze the scope of the project and
concluded that the existing national experiences and
options not allow for international comparisons , which
suggested holding the feasibility study AHELO (
Assessment for Higher Education Learning Outcomes).
In December, 2008, the Governing Body of the IMHE (for
its acronym in English, Program for Institutional
Management in Higher Education) decided to establish a
National Expert Group (Group of National Experts, GNE),
from countries that would participate in the study. This
National Expert Group would be responsible for guiding
the study implementation internationally.
Since its original proposals, the AHELO project has
sought to explore the scientific and practical
feasibility, to evaluate learning outcomes in higher
education in different cultural contexts. This seeks to
contribute improving the quality of higher education
from a different point of view on current systems of
evaluation and accreditation; through the identification
and characterization of scope, limitations and
possibilities of an initiative of this kind in the
international arena.
The feasibility study AHELO, was not designed to test
new rankings between institutions or higher education
graduates, but to generate an academic study on the
feasibility of measuring learning outcomes and
comparability at international level. It was clear since
the AHELO outset, that the study was not mean to
evaluate professional profiles as a whole or unify the
attributes and instructional or educational projects
that give foundation to those professional profiles in
the different countries or educational systems.
Rather, it was based on the international diversity of
higher education systems as a working premise, and
therefore became very clear the need to define certain
key learnings that could be common (but not only) to
these systems. For this reason, the AHELO study was
divided into three branches of research, namely:
- Generic skills
- Disciplinary skills in economics
- Disciplinary skills in civil engineering
Also, a contextual dimension was included to incorporate
variables that allow better interpretation of results.
Thus, during the years 2009-2011, the organization bases
GNE and working groups of each country were established.
Consulting entities that would support the process were
selected, frameworks were designed, and specific
evaluation instruments were made.
In Mexico, the project has been driven from its
beginning by Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí
(UASLP), University of Guadalajara (UDG), and Autonomous
University of Yucatán (UADY), , and) in close
coordination with the General Directorate of University
Higher Education (DGESU), Secretariat for Superior
Education, Secretariat of Public Education of Mexico.
This Secretariat has provided expert advice as well as
financial support, through the Higher Education
Development Support Program (PADES).
Mexico's participation was considered appropriate to
generate new institutional learning assessment, explore
alternative methodologies in international spectrum and
extend the evaluation capabilities of participating
institutions and generally the whole system of higher
education institutions.
In Mexico, fourteen higher education institutions joined
the AHELO project:
Institutions
|
Participation trends
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Civil engineering
|
Universidad Autónoma de San
Luis Potosí
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad de Guadalajara
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad Autónoma de
Yucatán
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Instituto Tecnológico y de
Estudios Superiores
de Monterrey
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad Veracruzana
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Instituto Politécnico
Nacional
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad Autónoma de
Coahuila
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad Autónoma de
Chihuahua
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad Autónoma de
Zacatecas
|
Generic
|
Economics
|
Engineering
|
Universidad Tecnológica de
la Mixteca
|
Generic
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Instituto Tecnológico
Superior de Irapuato
|
Generic
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Universidad Politécnica de
Aguascalientes
|
Generic
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Universidad de Ciencias y
Artes de Chiapas
|
Generic
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Universidad Autónoma de
Colima
|
n.a.
|
|
Engineering
|
The instruments application took place in 2012. At the
international level, 248 higher education institutions
participated in 17 countries and about 23,000 students
were involved. In Mexico 2,922 students and 983
professors participated in 112 sessions via web.
In 2013 several meetings to analyze, organize and
interpret data derived from tests, as well as an
international conference took place. From this, in 2014
the Mexican IES, all who participated in this project
developed their institutional reports and contributed to
the formulation of the project national report.
Therefore, another aim of the Colloquium is to present
the main lessons learned from the participation of
Mexico in the Feasibility Study "Assessing Learning
Outcomes" coordinated by the OECD.
For more information, the following websites are
available:
|
Related sites
Download
Colloquium program
This site will show the Colloquium updated information
About San Luis Potosí
|